Home > Uncategorized > Suggested Brand Supported Piracy Prohibition Rider for Touring Agreements

Suggested Brand Supported Piracy Prohibition Rider for Touring Agreements

February 1, 2013

As a follow up to yesterday’s post about artists contractually prohibiting promoters from advertising their shows on pirate sites, we have seen the following rider language start getting used:

“THE BUYER WILL NOT, AND WILL NOT AUTHORIZE THIRD PARTIES TO, ADVERTISE THE SHOW ON ANY WEBSITE THAT IS LISTED ON THE US TRADE REPRESENTATIVE’S NOTORIOUS MARKETS LIST (currently http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/121312%20Notorious%20Markets%20List.pdf), OR THAT IS LISTED IN THE GOOGLE TRANSPARENCY REPORT (currently http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/domains/?r=last-month), OR THAT THE ARTIST HAS INFORMED THE BUYER IS A SITE ON WHICH THE ARTIST DOES NOT WISH THE BUYER TO ADVERTISE THE SHOW.”

Obviously, this is not meant as legal advice and you should confirm with your own lawyers how this language might affect your rights under the particular agreement, but it should be a good starting place for any show agreement that is based on the American Federation of Musicians “One Nighter” agreement or the equivalent.

This language could be included in a watermark on any pdf version of a show agreement, or placed in the artist’s rider.  In more complex situations, you may wish to consider adding it as a flow down provision in a promoter agreement that requires the promoter to include the language in any show agreements.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 437 other followers

%d bloggers like this: